The interesting
question, although it may seem easy to answer, is why do men prefer
a direct approach? Two obvious answers are men's purported
inability to read body language or an assumed distaste for reading
situational subtleties (in other words: too stupid or can't be
bothered).
But researchers in
Germany provide us with evidence for an alternative explanation.
Grammer et
al. (2000) videotaped opposite sex pairs meeting for the first
time to catch the nuances of body language in the first 10 minutes
of an interaction. Afterwards women were asked how much interest
they had in the man they'd been talking to. The researchers
revealed two counter-intuitive results:
- In the first
minute women behaved no differently to men they fancied than those
they didn't. They sent many positive nonverbal signals to all the
men and hardly any negative signals.
- It is only between
the 4th and 10th minute that any correlation was seen between an
increased sending of positive nonverbal behaviours and wanting to
date the man. But even then the difference was only between some
positive signals and slightly more positive signals. Again negative
signals were very rare.
The reason men
prefer a direct approach becomes clearer. Women may think they are
sending out all the right nonverbal signals and may blame men for
failing to pick up on them. But from a man's perspective there may
often be little to pick up on because women, being polite, are
always sending positive nonverbal signals.
While it's not good
practice to generalise too much from one relatively small study of
45 participants whose age ranged from 18 to 23, the results accord
with what men say anecdotally: they often can't tell if women are
interested or not because the signals are too
ambiguous.