Many speeding
tickets are issued as the result of motorists being clocked with
devices that measure how fast a vehicle covers a known
distance.
Because some judges
and district attorneys are not comfortable with mathematical
calculations it is important for the well-prepared defendant to
present mathematical based arguments in the simplest of terms. We
will start from the end and work backwards.
A vehicle
moving one mile per hour will cover 1.47 feet in one
second.
If you wish to
determine how far a vehicle will travel at a specific speed just
multiply that speed by 1.47 feet. For example, if a vehicle is
traveling 60 mph it will cover 88 feet in one second. Obviously, it
will cover 176 feet in two seconds, etc.
If you
are trying to determine how many seconds it would take a
vehicle to cover a known distance at a specific speed just
divide the distance by the speed and divide the result by
1.47 feet.
This will yield the
number of seconds it would take the vehicle to cover a known
distance at a known speed.
For example: A
vehicle traveling 60 mph will cover 300 feet in 3.4 seconds—-300
divided by 60 divided by 1.47 = 3.4 seconds. If need be you can
verify this calculation by multiplying 3.4 seconds times 88 feet
(the distance traveled in one second at 60 mph) and the result
brings you back to 300 feet.
If you are
challenged on the validity of the 1.47 feet per second figure you
can prove its validity in very simple terms.
- There are 5280 feet in one mile so a vehicle traveling one mile
per hour will cover 5280 feet.
- There are 60
minutes in one hour so a vehicle traveling one mile per hour will
travel 1/60th of that distance in one minute, or 88 feet.
- There are 60
seconds in one minute so a vehicle traveling at one mile per hour
will cover 1/60th of the distance it covered in one minute, or 1.47
feet.
You could also state that there are 3600 seconds in one hour and
divide that number into 5280 feet and the result would be the same,
1.47 feet.
Once the
court accepts and understands the source of these numbers you can
apply them to your defense.
If you receive a VASCAR
ticket you should obtain a description of the distance over which
you were clocked, the time it took your vehicle to cover that
distance and the speed you are charged with traveling.
If the citation or incident report claims you covered
300 feet in 4.2 seconds and you are being charged with speeding at
60 mph in a 50 mph zone you can readily verify the accuracy, or
lack thereof in this case, of the speed you were claimed to be
traveling.
At 60 mph you would have traveled 370 feet, not 300 feet.
However, at 50 mph you would have traveled 309 feet in 4.2 seconds,
indicating that you were driving within the speed limit.
Even if the calculations indicated the error was in the opposite
direction, that your speed was underestimated, the speed-reading
should not be allowed as evidence against you, thus eliminating the
prosecutions principal evidence against you.
In other cases involving radar or pacing, time over
distance calculations can prove serious inconsistencies in the
officer’s testimony.
If the officer
testifies that he clocked your vehicle for 5 seconds and you were
going 80 mph, you can prove, by using time over distance
calculations, that the officer could not have seen you for more
than two seconds, because of a curve or sign, if you had been
traveling 80 miles per hour.