The Pros and
Cons of Joint Accounts
Blanche Lark Christerson, Esq.
Deutsche Bank Private Wealth Management

ou may be tempted to name a spouse or other
younger relative as joint owner of your bank, brokerage or mutual
fund accounts. That person will be able to handle the account if
you’re incapacitated. Typically, the accounts will be titled joint
tenants with right of survivorship (JTWROS). When one co-owner
dies, the survivor inherits.
Caution: Although setting up this
type of joint account is convenient and inexpensive, problems may
result, especially because the joint owner you name will inherit
the account no matter what it says in your will. An overreliance on
joint ownership may rob you of flexibility and result in the
payment of unnecessary tax, as explained below.
Advantages: In small doses, joint
ownership can be useful.
Example: If you reach a point
where you no longer can manage your own finances, your co-owner can
easily tap a jointly owned checking account and see that your bills
are paid. In addition, joint ownership might make sense when you
are certain that there is only one person you would want to inherit
a financial account. At one owner’s death, assets held as JTWROS
will be transferred to the co-owner without the delay and expense
of probate.
estate equality
To see a disadvantage of joint ownership, consider this scenario
where unnecessary estate tax is paid...
John Smith dies in 2008, when the federal estate tax exemption
is $2 million. All of his assets are held jointly with his wife,
Marge, so she inherits everything. Marge dies later in the year
with a $5 million estate. Her estate is $3 million over the
exemption so, at a 45% estate tax rate, $1.35 million is owed to
the IRS.
Trap: Because John’s assets were
held jointly, he had no assets to pass into a "credit shelter"
trust (one structure to use the federal estate tax break), so his
estate-tax exemption was wasted. The IRS collected an extra
$900,000 in estate tax.
Better way: John could have left
$2 million to a trust that would benefit Marge and then pass
tax-free to their son, Bob, at Marge’s death (the trust would avoid
estate tax because of John’s $2 million estate-tax exemption). Then
Marge could have left Bob $3 million, of which $2 million would be
sheltered by her estate-tax exemption. This plan would have
generated only $450,000 in federal estate tax (45% of $1 million),
not $1.35 million.
Strategy: If estate tax is a
concern, be sure that both spouses have assets subject to probate
(such as bank or brokerage accounts) that they can leave to a
credit-shelter trust. This will help ensure that they take full
advantage of their collective estate-tax exemptions ($4 million in
2008, $7 million in 2009).
step up to tax savings
As seen above, excess use of joint ownership by married couples
can lead to problems. The same may be true for joint ownership with
a nonspouse. The co-owner will inherit while would-be heirs will be
shut out.
Strategy: Instead of a joint
account, use a power of attorney or a trust to enable someone to
handle your finances in case you become incapacitated. This won’t
interfere with your plans to distribute your assets.
When would naming a nonspouse as co-owner make sense? If you
trust that person absolutely and you want him/her to inherit that
account.
Advantage: Naming a nonspouse as
joint owner is a simple, cost-effective way to provide for possible
incapacity. What’s more, a valuable tax break won’t be lost.
Example: Jane Jones has $400,000
worth of securities. Her basis is $100,000. If Jane dies as sole
owner and leaves her portfolio to her daughter, Alice, in her will,
Alice will inherit the securities with a stepped-up basis. After
Jane’s death, Alice can sell the inherited securities and owe no
capital gains tax on all the appreciation. (Note that this
appreciation may be subject to estate tax.) Now suppose that Jane
has named Alice as co-owner of the account. That basis step-up will
not be lost. If two co-owners are not married to each other, the
estate of the first owner to die will include a share of the
property based on the portion of the original purchase price
furnished by the decedent.
In our example, Jane had acquired all the securities before
adding Alice to the account as a joint owner. Thus, 100% of the
securities will be included in Jane’s estate and Alice will inherit
with a full basis step-up to market value even though she had been
named co-owner of the account.
Spousal treatment: What if, in
the above example, Jane had instead named her husband, Dan, joint
owner of her brokerage account? At Jane’s death, all of the assets
in the account would have gone to Dan, but he would have received
only half of a basis step-up.
Example: Assume Jane dies when
the securities are worth $400,000. Only Jane’s half of the account
($200,000) gets a basis step-up.
Therefore, Dan’s basis in the inherited assets would be $200,000
(a basis step-up for Jane’s half) plus $50,000 (Dan’s half of the
original $100,000 basis).
Exceptions: Generally, in
community property states, such as California, Nevada, and Texas,
Dan would get a full basis step-up. Also, joint tenancies created
before 1977 by Jane get a full step-up for Dan.
Strategy: Learn the laws of your
state. Assuming the basis step-up will be 50%, not 100%, it might
make sense to hold highly appreciated assets in one name so the
surviving spouse can inherit with a full step-up.
gift tax trouble
Using joint ownership can lead to a gift-tax trap.
Example: Jane Jones has named her
daughter, Alice, co-owner of her brokerage account, as above. Alice
then withdraws cash or securities from this joint account.
Such a withdrawal may be treated as a taxable gift. If so,
gift-tax returns may have to be filed and gift tax might have to be
paid.
Acceptable: Alice can withdraw
assets to pay for her mother’s expenses. That won’t trigger tax
consequences.
Not acceptable: If Alice uses the
withdrawn assets for any other purpose (besides Jane’s expenses),
the withdrawal will be treated as a gift from Jane to Alice.
If such gifts this year top $12,000, a gift tax return will have
to be filed. Once Jane has made a total of $1 million worth of
taxable gifts to Alice and other recipients, gift tax will have to
be paid if additional gifts are made.
Strategy: If the co-owner named
to someone else’s account withdraws assets, document the fact that
the assets were used on behalf of the original owner. A diary and
cancelled checks can serve as proof.